Virus Central Support

     Go!
Prospero Blocks


 

Chat Center

Get smart...
Topic: about computer security.

Board Folders

Virus Questions: 5014 msgs in 678 dscns, Latest: Feb-8 Virus Questions
5014 msgs in 678 dscns
Latest: Feb-8
Alerts & News: 1646 msgs in 258 dscns, Latest: Jan-23 Alerts & News
1646 msgs in 258 dscns
Latest: Jan-23
Anti-Malware Software: 2355 msgs in 263 dscns, Latest: 8:59 AMAnti-Malware S...
2355 msgs in 263 dscns
Latest: 8:59 AM
Spyware & Adware: 2541 msgs in 342 dscns, Latest: 12:42 PMSpyware & Adware
2541 msgs in 342 dscns
Latest: 12:42 PM
Member Experiences: 1437 msgs in 194 dscns, Latest: Feb-4 Member Experie...
1437 msgs in 194 dscns
Latest: Feb-4
Hoaxes & Myths: 113 msgs in 17 dscns, Latest: Nov-13 Hoaxes & Myths
113 msgs in 17 dscns
Latest: Nov-13
McAfee: 470 msgs in 81 dscns, Latest: Dec-18 McAfee
470 msgs in 81 dscns
Latest: Dec-18
Security & Privacy: 1958 msgs in 219 dscns, Latest: Jan-22 Security ...
1958 msgs in 219 dscns
Latest: Jan-22
Wandering Thoughts: 1063 msgs in 125 dscns, Latest: Dec-20 Wandering Thou...
1063 msgs in 125 dscns
Latest: Dec-20
Norton / Symantec: 5481 msgs in 593 dscns, Latest: Jan-22 Norton / Symantec
5481 msgs in 593 dscns
Latest: Jan-22
Message Area
Alerts & News

NOD32 Free Upgrade to Version 3

 Subscribe SubscribeCreate Poll Create PollGet a printer-friendly version of this discussion Print Discussion 

#1 of 18

     Posted 11/11/07 4:29 PM   
Michel Uphoff
 
From  Michel Uphoff  Posts 141  Last 7/6/09
To  Duane White / WUGNET      [Msg # 156155.1 ]    

[I've moved these messages from a thread in the Norton AntiVirus section as they are relevant to the new version of NOD32 now out and about. /...Duane]

Duane,

>> but I don't think that's going to happen <<

It isn't Symantec. Ofcourse the upgrade's are free:

Free Upgrade to ESET NOD32 Antivirus v3.0

Current customers click here to download your free upgrade to ESET NOD32 Antivirus v3.0 which installs over your existing version using your same username and password.  To learn more about ESET NOD32 Antivirus Version 3.0 click here. 

Please note ESET NOD32 Antivirus v3.0 is for computers running Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional, XP and Vista.  If you have an older version of Microsoft Windows, you are fully protected by ESET NOD32 v2.7 for the duration of your license.
Michel Uphoff (NLcomputing)
Homepage


Edited 11/16/07   by  Duane White / WUGNET
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#2 of 18

     Posted 11/11/07 7:23 PM   
Duane White / WUGNET
 
From  Duane White / WUGNET  Posts 2496  Last Nov-19
To  Michel Uphoff      [Msg # 156155.2 Message 156155.2 replying to 156155.1 156155.1 ]    

Michel,

Thanks for that information. One of the reasons I bought into NOD32 was that I believed that should a new version of the product be released while you had a valid license that you would be entitled to a upgrade to that version at no extra cost. I spent 15-minutes at least digging around the ESET site a couple of days ago and found nothing about upgrading. Went back today and found the link to the same page you give in less than a minute. I may have been too early or just not being particularly observant that day.

In any event, thanks again. My faith is restored. <grin>

/...Duane

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#3 of 18

     Posted 11/11/07 9:40 PM   
Steven Stern / Sysop
 
From  Steven Stern / Sysop  Posts 1063  Last 7/5/09
To  Duane White / WUGNET      [Msg # 156155.3 Message 156155.3 replying to 156155.2 156155.2 ]    
Thanks. Downloading now.
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#4 of 18

     Posted 11/12/07 8:59 PM   
John Murff
 
From  John Murff  Posts 31  Last Jan-13
To  Michel Uphoff      [Msg # 156155.4 Message 156155.4 replying to 156155.1 156155.1 ]    
>>  Free Upgrade to ESET NOD32 Antivirus v3.0 <<

Some on Wilder report that v3.0x is not so well behaved.  I have v2.7 working well on two XP-Pro laptops and will wait a bit. 

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#5 of 18

     Posted 11/12/07 9:31 PM   
Duane White / WUGNET
 
From  Duane White / WUGNET  Posts 2496  Last Nov-19
To  John Murff      [Msg # 156155.5 Message 156155.5 replying to 156155.4 156155.4 ]    

John,

3.0 is working well here on XP. Much nicer and more user friendly interface.

/...Duane

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#6 of 18

     Posted 11/13/07 12:53 AM   
John Murff
 
From  John Murff  Posts 31  Last Jan-13
To  Duane White / WUGNET      [Msg # 156155.6 Message 156155.6 replying to 156155.5 156155.5 ]    
Duane,

Thanks - I guess I'll give it a go and see what happens.
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#7 of 18

     Posted 11/13/07 9:19 AM   
Duane White / WUGNET
 
From  Duane White / WUGNET  Posts 2496  Last Nov-19
To  John Murff      [Msg # 156155.7 Message 156155.7 replying to 156155.6 156155.6 ]    

John,

Since I have NOD32 on three different systems here, I can be "brave" and test load it on one of the systems. <grin> It is working well, however, and I notice that some of the things I didn't like about the 2.x versions have been fixed. The new version has a standard and advanced interface -- the standard interface is designed to be very user friendly and that's a good thing as the older version's interface while perfectly logical was not particularly user friendly to non-Geek.

/...Duane

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#8 of 18

     Posted 11/13/07 12:01 PM   
Michel Uphoff
 
From  Michel Uphoff  Posts 141  Last 7/6/09
To  John Murff      [Msg # 156155.8 Message 156155.8 replying to 156155.4 156155.4 ]    

John,

>> Some on Wilder report that v3.0x is not so well behaved. <<

Not the bèta? There were some problems with pictures but they were solved within a few day's. There was allso a problem in conjunction with µtorent and Ie7. I have both and nod 3.0 running here simultanious without problems.

OTOH there is no need to rush.


Michel Uphoff (NLcomputing)
Homepage

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#9 of 18

     Posted 11/13/07 3:35 PM   
John Murff
 
From  John Murff  Posts 31  Last Jan-13
To  Duane White / WUGNET      [Msg # 156155.9 Message 156155.9 replying to 156155.7 156155.7 ]    
Duane,

I'm 'brave,' too, I put v3 on one laptop but left v2.7 on the other.  V3 installed easily last night but this morning I had all kinds of trouble with both laptops, I think with the router.  Whether that was due to the new AV or some coincidental glitch, who can say?  What with resetting the modem and router along with reinstalling v3, all is now well on both machines.  In a week or two, I'll probably put v3 on the other laptop.

You're right about the interface, the old one left me wondering about more than a few things.  Then again, I tend to stay with default settings which are usually the best course for the ignorant.


 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#10 of 18

     Posted 11/13/07 3:41 PM   
John Murff
 
From  John Murff  Posts 31  Last Jan-13
To  Michel Uphoff      [Msg # 156155.10 Message 156155.10 replying to 156155.8 156155.8 ]    
Michael,

Not the Beta but not the most recent, either. 

I have 3.0.563.0 which seems to work well enough although I haven't checked the footprint against that of v2.7.


 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#11 of 18

     Posted 11/13/07 5:42 PM   
Duane White / WUGNET
 
From  Duane White / WUGNET  Posts 2496  Last Nov-19
To  John Murff      [Msg # 156155.11 Message 156155.11 replying to 156155.9 156155.9 ]    

John,

Something is out and about and playing with routers as I have a regular client with the BitDefender suite (including the firewall) and a router and something got onto her laptop and caused all sorts of flakey behavior prompting her to bring it to me. BitDefender's logs show it had said some king of a major struggle with some version of QHost but seems to have brought it under control just about the time she gave up and brought me the laptop (because I couldn't find anything wrong with it).

However, her she discovered that while her old laptop would do Email, it wouldn't do the web until after she called me up and we tried several things before getting round to rebooting the router which fixed the problem. I myself had no trouble here as long as I had her notebook connected wirelessly. When I connected it by ethernet for a big download, then a little later I started to get poor net behavior -- a ping would time out, take a long time, time out, take a long time. I thought it was just RoadRunner being flakey but it was still doing the same the next morning. I'd already tried hard-resetting the modem and it didn't help, but after I hard-reset my router suddenly everything was back to normal.

I've had this router several months and never had to reboot it -- curious indeed. So, I'm doing a double, double check of her system but so far everything I've thrown at it has come up with nothing except a few cookies.

/...Duane

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#12 of 18

     Posted 11/13/07 6:15 PM   
Michel Uphoff
 
From  Michel Uphoff  Posts 141  Last 7/6/09
To  John Murff      [Msg # 156155.12 Message 156155.12 replying to 156155.10 156155.10 ]    

John,

>> checked the footprint against that of v2.7 <<

I did a few quick tests. The numbers:

             processes  MBRam DataCopy DataSearch
Nod32 v 2.7  2          31    65 sec   160 sec
Nod32 v 3.0  2          30    66 sec   163 sec

So, there is no noticeable difference in footprint or speed.


Michel Uphoff (NLcomputing)
Homepage

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#13 of 18

     Posted 11/13/07 9:57 PM   
John Murff
 
From  John Murff  Posts 31  Last Jan-13
To  Duane White / WUGNET      [Msg # 156155.13 Message 156155.13 replying to 156155.11 156155.11 ]    
All of my 'resets' are hard if that means cutting the power for two or three minutes - why they have reset buttons is beyond me.

It's difficult to imagine something getting at a router with my ISP which has very effective filters but that is the simplest explanation.  There are the two laptops and a printer all cabled to the router and the laptops can use wi-fi if wanted - all cabled connections were initially gone as well as the wireless on the machine which had v3 installed, it was never tried on the other machine. 

Should something like this occur again, I'll be a bit more methodical give a coherent report.

Edit:  FWIW both machines are XP-Pro and use Comodo as the software firewall.


Edited 11/13/07   by  John Murff
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#14 of 18

     Posted 11/13/07 9:59 PM   
John Murff
 
From  John Murff  Posts 31  Last Jan-13
To  Michel Uphoff      [Msg # 156155.14 Message 156155.14 replying to 156155.12 156155.12 ]    
Michael,

Thank you, there seemed to be little difference but measurements are better than 'seems.'
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#15 of 18

     Posted 11/18/07 7:27 PM   
John Murff
 
From  John Murff  Posts 31  Last Jan-13
To  All      [Msg # 156155.15 Message 156155.15 replying to 156155.14 156155.14 ]    
Further on Nod 32 v3 -

It takes 2~3 seconds for Outlook Express to close following a click on the 'X' or Alt-F4.  All else works perfectly.  To verify, I reinstalled v2.7 which permitted an instant shutdown and then went back to v3.  I think it no big deal, only something to know about. 
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#16 of 18

     Posted 11/19/07 3:19 PM   
Michel Uphoff
 
From  Michel Uphoff  Posts 141  Last 7/6/09
To  John Murff      [Msg # 156155.16 Message 156155.16 replying to 156155.15 156155.15 ]    

John,

>> It takes 2~3 seconds for Outlook Express to close <<

Same observations here. Notified Eset a few day's ago.


Michel Uphoff (NLcomputing)
Homepage

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#17 of 18

     Posted 11/19/07 4:17 PM   
Michel Uphoff
 
From  Michel Uphoff  Posts 141  Last 7/6/09
To  John Murff      [Msg # 156155.17 Message 156155.17 replying to 156155.15 156155.15 ]    

John,

Just received an answer from Eset. I asked them:

It appears to me that the OE icon is there for quick setting changes, and not for the actual email scanning itself, since only Outlook (Express) and Win Mail show that plugin. Eset states however that every pop3 client is protected. When I disable this plugin (setup, advanced, chapter miscellaneous, remove checkmarks "integrate into Outlook ...... "), the delay is gone.

In ESS this plugin is allso used for the antispam module. Since you have EAV installed, you can disable it for now and POP3 traffic will still be checked unless you disable email protection.


Michel Uphoff (NLcomputing)
Homepage

 OptionsReply to this Message Reply

#18 of 18

     Posted 11/21/07 4:20 PM   
John Murff
 
From  John Murff  Posts 31  Last Jan-13
To  Michel Uphoff      [Msg # 156155.18 Message 156155.18 replying to 156155.17 156155.17 ]    
Michael,

Thank you.  I "solved" the problem in a less subtle way by putting Outlook on the machine.  For whatever reason, Outlook works without hesitation. 

With your solution, I'll probably go back to O.E. since there are things about it that, for me, are preferable.
 OptionsReply to this Message Reply
 Subscribe SubscribeCreate Poll Create PollGet a printer-friendly version of this discussion Print Discussion 
Alerts & News

NOD32 Free Upgrade to Version 3

  
 
     

Welcome, Guest

  • Post a message
  • New messages to you
  • Log in

Start Search
Advanced Search

Prospero Blocks
 
 
Special Offers
 
 
 

Finding People

 
 
 

Cool Clicks!

 
 
 
© 2009 Netscape Communications Corp. All rights reserved.

Legal Notices | Privacy Policy