Mel: >> No, I did not.  If you review the question I asked you, you will find I didn't ask you if there was a difference between Muslims and Christians.

You: >>Who did then? <<

To the best of my knowledge, no one.  Nonetheless, I know I didn't .

If you believe I am mistaken, please show me the evidence.  A back quote or a message number would work.  

I don't believe you can show anywhere where I posted that Muslims and Christians are different.  Hint. To differentiate is not the same as two things being different.

If you are mistaken, is there a possibility that you will admit so on the board?  That is the Christian way, isn't it?

Mel: >>The wording here implies you might believe you are better than I am.
Curious, what?

No disrespect, but I wonder if you may have a falacy of picking apart "DOO-DOO" out of fly s###. I fail to understand how my words are misinterpreted to be insulting or offensive when I KNOW that is not what my intentions were. I also wonder if because I am not liked in this forum, as George told me in a previous post, is why the meaning of my words are always taken in a negative way by you and Calvin. I am trying my best to get along in this forum in every best and civil manner I can, even though my views may not favor that of yours and others. I'm not here to offend or insult anyone. There was a time I use to do these things, but I didn't like that side of myself, nor did I respect being that way, and nor do I intend to repeat it.

>>I believe it is possible you are attempting to play some kind of game with me.
 

I was thinking the same thing about you. Now that you've cleared the matter up;  I'd like to thank you for your kind understanding.

Nativity scenes don't physically harm or kill people.

>>Why differentiate between Christians and Muslims?

I see where I was in error of misunderstanding your question. I am due for a new pair of glasses. So, I will apologize for thinking you asked me what WAS the difference instead of WHY.  So let me answer this again if I may. I only differentiate between the two for the fact that the acts of terrorism against this nation were mainly Muslim Islamic extremists. I have not heard of where non-Muslims were behind the 911 terrorist acts in this nation, or other such deliberate attacks against innocent people for religious beliefs. 

<<...I only differentiate between the two for the fact that the acts of terrorism against this nation were mainly Muslim Islamic extremists. I have not heard of where non-Muslims were behind the 911 terrorist acts in this nation, or other such deliberate attacks against innocent people for religious beliefs.  >>

The word "mainly" is used.  In fact, there have been many terrorist acts within the United States done by non-Muslims, and a number which have been justified by those doing them by their beliefs, religious or otherwise.

>>Here's one incident.  All I did was Google "Aryan Nation."
The country around Hayden is beautiful, but not all the people around Hayden are. 

I don't deny we have those few nut jobs in America, but this is an isolated case of one individual not connected to a specific group, race or religion that hold the same cause and ideals. Did he have any followers ploting bombings or connections with others like him in other parts of the world? Did he have any funding from others like him, or supports funding money to others like him in other countries? I know of no non-Muslims who do these things in todays world. Using past crimes of America's history or islolated cases such as this old man seem to be the excusing arguments of the 911 tragedy. This old man doesn't compare to what really threatens America, or other nations. Thank you for your time.